Climate change is one of the big things being in the news and in politics for some time, and is intensifying recently with the Copenhagen Conference.
I saw this very interesting presentation by Lord Monckton debunking the false evidence use to proof climate change. What is surprising is not only does he presents technical / scientific details to debunk climate change campaigners, in the last part of his speech of his speech he said the Copenhagen Treaty had plans for a one world government.
The draft treaty is: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
A search in the internet will show many links to the discussion of world government and Copenhagen. Although most of these links may be just private opinions, an actual Wall Street Journal article also reported this claim. The same article also appeared in The Australian newspaper.
The excerpt is below:
----------------------------------------
OCTOBER 28, 2009, 7:05 P.M. ET
Has Anyone Read the Copenhagen Agreement?
By JANET ALBRECHTSEN
We can only hope that world leaders will do nothing more than enjoy a pleasant bicycle ride around the charming streets of Copenhagen come December. For if they actually manage to wring out an agreement based on the current draft text of the Copenhagen climate-change treaty, the world is in for some nasty surprises. Draft text, you say? If you haven't heard about it, that's because none of our otherwise talkative political leaders have bothered to tell us what the drafters have already cobbled together for leaders to consider. And neither have the media.
Enter Lord Christopher Monckton. The former adviser to Margaret Thatcher gave an address at Bethel University in St. Paul, Minnesota, earlier this month that made quite a splash. For the first time, the public heard about the 181 pages, dated Sept. 15, that comprise the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change—a rough draft of what could be signed come December.
So far there have been more than a million hits on the YouTube post of his address. It deserves millions more because Lord Monckton warns that the aim of the Copenhagen draft treaty is to set up a transnational "government" on a scale the world has never before seen.
The "scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention" that starts on page 18 contains the provision for a "government." The aim is to give a new as yet unnamed U.N. body the power to directly intervene in the financial, economic, tax and environmental affairs of all the nations that sign the Copenhagen treaty.
