Showing posts with label Evolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Evolution. Show all posts

Thursday, October 12, 2017

Evolution about Light and Dark Skin Wrong - Again

The Ancient Origins of Both Light and Dark Skin

Yes another article turning the table on beliefs that was based on the incorrect theory of Evolution. Simple scientific theory means that any theory build on the wrong initial assumption, ie starting point, must be wrong. This is the case here where Evolution of Humans from Apes is taken as fact, and then used to explain the difference between light and dark skin people.

The article claims to have found evidence that the previous thought that humans originated out of Africa and everyone had black skin - then evolved into light skin when they moved to other continents; is incorrect. Based on the evidence of diversity of genes and genes for light skin found in ancient Africa, this was used to debunk the previous theory. However the article jump to the opposite conclusion that people were originally light skin, which may also be incorrect.

They would get much better conclusion if they referred back to Genesis which shows that humans can trace our unity back to Noah and then diversified starting from his three sons: Ham, Shem and Japheth. 

Saturday, October 26, 2013

Missing Link - Fish with Jaws

Yet another article to try and explain the missing link between species. It would be interesting to see when the conjectures in this article are debunked. Here it is believed that the fossil of this fish suggest that it had jaws. So the conclusion must be that this fish developed jaws and its descendants evolved into other creatures with jaws - probably leading one way or another to humans.


--------------------------------------------------------

Scientists come face to face with evolution's missing link

http://www.smh.com.au/technology/sci-tech/scientists-come-face-to-face-with-evolutions-missing-link-20130925-2ueio.html


Friday, March 16, 2012

More PreHistoric Discovery That Does Not Fit


It's no wonder why the so-called experts are stumped here. If they base their current knowledge on assumptions that are wrong, new discoveries like this often surface and force them to change their theories to accommodate it. It is clear from God's Word where humans came from and who created them. Starting from this fact, archaeology discoveries may start to make sense to the experts.


Scientists stumped by prehistoric human whose face doesn't fit
Deborah Smith, March 15, 2012

The Red Deer Cave people
Associate Professor Darren Curnoe from the University of NSW talks about the discovery in China.
THEY have been dubbed the Red Deer Cave people and they are a big mystery.
Fossils of this previously unknown group of prehistoric humans, who lived as recently as 11,500 years ago, have been discovered in south-west China by a team including Melbourne researchers.
Their highly unusual mix of archaic and modern features raises the possibility they represent a new species of human.



First they say pre-historic animals are big, then later became smaller. Now they are saying the opposite.




As animals evolve, they grow larger: study
http://www.echo.net.au/2015/02/animals-evolve-grow-larger-study/

"As animals evolve they tend to get larger over time, researchers have concluded in a sweeping study that tracked thousands of creatures over a half-billion-year period."



Researchers Suggest Neanderthal Women Actually Hunted Alongside Neanderthal Men, Gender Roles Not So Specified


Studying the past has always been more than a hobby for some people, especially for archaeologists, paleontologists, and other historical researchers. Yet the study of ancient relatives, close to homo sapiens, garner importance for historians.

In that sense, the ancient species closest to homo sapiens are neanderthals. By studying them, researchers learn how they lived before we replaced them. The discovery of a neanderthal multi-purpose tool points to their ability to innovate. Still, they were probably unable to keep up with the changes, dying out 10,000 years before research says the first homo sapiens arrived. Now researchers are stating that despite believed gender roles, neanderthal women actually hunted alongside their male counterpart.



Milk of human kindness evolved long before our intelligence: Early humans' sense of compassion revealed
Early humans carried pebbles shaped like babies' faces, say researchers
And some 1.5 million years later they had learned to care for the sick
This was a million years before intelligence is thought to have emerged

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Scientists Confirm Rocks Fell From Mars

http://m.apnews.mobi/ap/db_36972/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=ijti6NB8


Here is a news about a recent rock believed to have come from Mars. Scientists are very excited because this rock just dropped to Earth recently making it a fresh sample. But more interestingly is the comment at the end of this article - here is what is says about the once popular theory that life came from Mars via meteorites.


"A Martian meteorite that was buried in Antarctica made news in 1996. NASA scientists theorized the rock showed traces of life from Mars. Even the White House declared it the first sign of life outside of Earth. Years of study since then have led much of the astronomy world to conclude there was insufficient evidence to support the claim."




Thursday, August 4, 2011

Prehistoric Bird May Not Be A Bird At All.

Holes appearing in the theory of evolution. The linking of dinosaur bones based on the assumption that evolution is real, may be in tatters. This article points to one evidence how the belief can be so wrong regarding the prehistoric creature supposedly being a bird with flight abilities.



Reputation as earliest bird may not have the feathers to fly
July 29, 2011

"LONDON: Archaeopteryx, the famous icon of evolution and supposedly the planet's oldest, most primitive bird, might not have been a bird after all.
The controversial claim, if confirmed, is something of a bombshell for researchers, who have viewed the evolution of birds and feathered flight through the lens of the species since it was discovered 150 years ago."

Thursday, July 23, 2009

All humans came from the same source

The Word of God says that the Earth's population was repopulated after the Great Flood by Noah and his three sons' family. The article below shows how scientists agree that the world's population was once living in the same place and then migrated away or spread out.

If evolution was true, wouldn't humans just arise independently at different location or spread out earlier without first congregating?


*************************************************
Source: http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/wellbeing/first-australians-were-indian-research-20090722-dtnh.html

First Australians were Indian: research
July 23, 2009
CLUES about how the first Aborigines arrived in Australia have been unveiled by Indian scientists. Based on a series of genetic tests, they believe Aborigines travelled from Africa to Australia via India.

Dr Raghavendra Rao and researchers from the Indian-government backed Anthropological Survey of India project found unique genetic mutations were shared between modern-day Indians and Aborigines, suggesting Australia's indigenous people had spent time on the subcontinent.

The scientists did genetic tests on 966 individuals from 26 of India's "relic populations" and identified seven people from central Dravidian and Austro-Asiatic tribes who shared genetic traits only found in Aborigines. "We found certain mutations in the DNA sequences of the Indian tribes … that are specific to Aborigines," Dr Rao said.

"This … suggests that the Aborigine population migrated to Australia via the so-called southern route."

Scientists believe the first modern humans began spreading around the world from Africa about 50,000 years ago. But little is known about which routes they took.

Some studies have suggested they used a single southern route stretching from the Horn of Africa, across the Red Sea into Arabia and southern Asia.

They were then believed to have moved along the coastlines of southern Asia, South-East Asia and Indonesia before arriving in Australia about 45,000 years ago.

Dr Rao said the new research, published by the online scientific journal BMC Evolutionary Biology yesterday, indicated there was direct DNA evidence about how modern humans spread from Africa 50,000 years ago. "In this respect, populations in the Indian subcontinent harbour DNA footprints of the earliest expansion out of Africa," he said.

Monday, July 20, 2009

Nephilim? - Why Neanderthals were always an endangered species

The article below talks about the inferior DNA of Neanderthals. This would not be surprising if in fact Neanderthals turn out to be the Nephilims mentioned in God's Word. Scientifically, hybrids between species usually are not able to produce successfully. In God's own words, he made the all creatures on Earth such that they produce "their own kind", hybrids are not part of God's plan. No wonder the Neanderthal / Nephilim DNA is inferior for reproductive purposes.

Footnote: Sudden extinction of Neanderthals and most of other humans are caused by the Great Flood.

An article on Nephilim and Neanderthal:
http://jacksonsnyder.com/Arc/Essays%206/Neaderthal.htm

Genesis 6:3-5 (New International Version)
3 Then the LORD said, "My Spirit will not contend with [a] man forever, for he is mortal [b] ; his days will be a hundred and twenty years."
4 The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.
5 The LORD saw how great man's wickedness on the earth had become, and that every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil all the time.



++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Why Neanderthals were always an endangered species

10:55 17 July 2009 by Ewen Callaway



For much of their 400,000 year history, Neanderthals were few and far between, a new analysis of genetic material from several of the extinct, ancient humans now suggests.

It's difficult to put a number on the population of a species based on DNA alone, but less than a few hundred thousand of the archaic humans roamed Europe and Asia at any one time, says Adrian Briggs, an evolutionary geneticist at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig. "There never were million and millions of Neanderthals," he told New Scientist.

That conclusion isn't exactly Earth-shattering. Archaeological digs suggest that Neanderthals hardly lived in megacities, and the mitochondrial genome sequence from one individual found in Croatia also hints at low population sizes.

But the new findings represent the most detailed look at Neanderthal genetic diversity yet published.

Low diversity

What is most obvious is how little genetic heterogeneity they possessed. The mitochondrial genomes of six Neanderthals recovered in Spain, Croatia, Germany and Russia differ at only 55 locations out of more than 16,000 letters. This represents three times less mitochondrial diversity than modern humans possess.

.

Because of this low diversity, Briggs' team infers that Neanderthal populations must have been relatively small. "Populations with much larger sizes carry more genetic diversity, you have more individuals and more mutations," he says.

The researchers analysed bone samples that, by and large, came during the twilight of the Neanderthal's reign around 40,000 years ago. Neanderthals probably went extinct somewhere between 24,000 and 28,000 years ago.

It's possible that Briggs' team has taken a genetic snapshot of a species on the verge of extinction, however other genetic clues indicate that Neanderthal populations stayed low for much of their history, he says.

Highs and lows

Neanderthal mitochondria were far more likely than humans or chimpanzees to contain potentially harmful mutations in mitochondrial genes that changed the shape of proteins, Brigg's team found. Since these mutations incur an evolutionary cost, they will eventually be weeded out. But this process occurs very slowly in small populations, Briggs says. Hence, Neanderthals numbers probably stayed low for a long time.

Chris Stringer, a palaeontologist at the Natural History Museum in London, agrees that Neanderthal populations were probably small. "They must have been on the edge of extinction by this time to have so few people scattered in Europe," he says.

However during warm spells, their numbers and range probably swelled, only to contract in leaner times, Stringer says. "I think the numbers would have fluctuated. They would have had good times and bad times, and this data reflect that in the last 100,000 years they were having bad times."

It's tempting to think that the arrival of modern humans to Europe about 45,000 years ago pushed Neanderthal numbers even lower by competing for increasingly scarce resources. But the invading Homo sapiens would have been relatively rare too, Stringer says. "You've got to consider the possibility that they might not have met each other that often."

Journal reference: Science (DOI: 10.1126/science.1174462)