It rained for 2 million years - actually it was Noah's Global Flood

There are now countless seemingly more plausible and believable explanations that the Geology shows the Earth is much younger than the millions of years and also that Noah's Flood is global. The global nature and suddenness of the Flood caused complex geological formation to occur suddenly. But if scientists didn't know that a global flood was real, then the geological formation must seem to have taken an incredibly long time to form.

New evidence have now been suggested in this article that perhaps a long time ago, there was an incredible amount of rainfall. 

https://medium.com/lessons-from-history/that-time-it-rained-for-two-million-years-d885f1af850a

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YiV4wOvnfM&t=53s

 I find these articles very interesting because I know how the Earth was formed - as described in God's Word - The Bible. The Secular world has developed very far fetched theories, based on unfounded or unproveable assumptions. One wrong assumption after another leads to the conclusion of the Earth being billions of years old. At the same time, oral history passed on through the generations that included a global flood was regarded as legends, myth and finally fairy tales. However, there are now various new scientific discoveries (the aim of this blog is to record these) such as the above article that finds scientific evidence piece by piece, that confirms Biblical events. Yet we have to read the articles like above and pick the evidence out, and observe that even if the found the truth in the evidence, the truth is being wrapped up in the old erroneous theories, not to mentioned the jargon like Triassic Period, the Carnian Pluvial Event, etc.

The article of course talks about evidence showing there was Rain for two million years. Read deeper into the article and see that the evidence they found is actually a huge amount of water deposited all over the world. This fact is true. But because they assume there is no global flood, so the water must have been deposited in 2 million years of non-stop rain. So the evidence is still true, that there was a huge amount of water - and we know this is due to the global flood.

"So do we know that this period of rain truly existed?....While scientists were expecting to find giant arid rocks, they instead found thickly layered rocks in giant lakes and evidence of coal swamps that confirmed their theory of a long period of rainfall..."

The amount of water is only the beginning of the story. Of course a lot of the explanation in the article are different to the Bible, but it is amazing how much the facts itself are aligned with the Bible - so the interesting challenge is to separate the facts from the opinions. So the article talks about the fact that there were lots of animals that became extinct before the Rain - we know that many animals must have died due to the sudden global flood.

 Its also interesting that the article blamed the rain to be caused by the burning of coal and severe climate change. It almost sounds as if it is trying to warn us of our so called present climate crisis. the coal is interesting since one of the link below explains that the Flood itself is one of the main factors that produced large amounts of coal. There are various other sources below that describes the scientific process in geology as a consequence of the global flood.

Evidence of a Young Earth that is consistent with the Biblical narrative has been documented in many different sources. A summary of the book with many scientific arguments are https://endtimesevents.blogspot.com/2020/07/notes-on-scientific-creationism-by.html. Another new discovery that forces a rethink on the age of the earth is https://endtimesevents.blogspot.com/2020/02/new-age-of-earth-or-how-long-it-took-to.html

 Videos that talk about a Young Earth or Noah's Flood being global:

Evidence that Noah's Flood Formed the Fossil Record - Dr. Kurt Wise (The Paleontology of the Flood) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCdt6LjvFvA

How did rapid catastrophic processes form the Grand Canyon? - Dr. Steve Austin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvYepk4_F7E

Is There Evidence of a Global Flood? with Dr. Georgia Purdom https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47vDpY3eMXg

Science Confirms a Young Earth—The Radioactive Dating Methods are Flawed - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AomTKRLB_4&t=2736s

What Do Floating Log Mats Have to Do with Noah's Flood? - Dr. Steve Austin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjA-jYEWlwU

More PreHistoric Discovery That Does Not Fit

It's no wonder why the so-called experts are stumped here. If they base their current knowledge on assumptions that are wrong, new discoveries like this often surface and force them to change their theories to accommodate it. It is clear from God's Word where humans came from and who created them. Starting from this fact, archaeology discoveries may start to make sense to the experts.


Scientists stumped by prehistoric human whose face doesn't fit
Deborah Smith, March 15, 2012

The Red Deer Cave people
Associate Professor Darren Curnoe from the University of NSW talks about the discovery in China.
THEY have been dubbed the Red Deer Cave people and they are a big mystery.
Fossils of this previously unknown group of prehistoric humans, who lived as recently as 11,500 years ago, have been discovered in south-west China by a team including Melbourne researchers.
Their highly unusual mix of archaic and modern features raises the possibility they represent a new species of human.



First they say pre-historic animals are big, then later became smaller. Now they are saying the opposite.




As animals evolve, they grow larger: study
http://www.echo.net.au/2015/02/animals-evolve-grow-larger-study/

"As animals evolve they tend to get larger over time, researchers have concluded in a sweeping study that tracked thousands of creatures over a half-billion-year period."



Researchers Suggest Neanderthal Women Actually Hunted Alongside Neanderthal Men, Gender Roles Not So Specified


Studying the past has always been more than a hobby for some people, especially for archaeologists, paleontologists, and other historical researchers. Yet the study of ancient relatives, close to homo sapiens, garner importance for historians.

In that sense, the ancient species closest to homo sapiens are neanderthals. By studying them, researchers learn how they lived before we replaced them. The discovery of a neanderthal multi-purpose tool points to their ability to innovate. Still, they were probably unable to keep up with the changes, dying out 10,000 years before research says the first homo sapiens arrived. Now researchers are stating that despite believed gender roles, neanderthal women actually hunted alongside their male counterpart.



Milk of human kindness evolved long before our intelligence: Early humans' sense of compassion revealed
Early humans carried pebbles shaped like babies' faces, say researchers
And some 1.5 million years later they had learned to care for the sick
This was a million years before intelligence is thought to have emerged

Prehistoric Bird May Not Be A Bird At All.

Holes appearing in the theory of evolution. The linking of dinosaur bones based on the assumption that evolution is real, may be in tatters. This article points to one evidence how the belief can be so wrong regarding the prehistoric creature supposedly being a bird with flight abilities.



Reputation as earliest bird may not have the feathers to fly
July 29, 2011

"LONDON: Archaeopteryx, the famous icon of evolution and supposedly the planet's oldest, most primitive bird, might not have been a bird after all.
The controversial claim, if confirmed, is something of a bombshell for researchers, who have viewed the evolution of birds and feathered flight through the lens of the species since it was discovered 150 years ago."